Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Documentally's avatar

As promised here are the full answers Michael Howard from foto was kind enough to answer.

"Q. Do you see the AI contributors as a viable part of the paying supporting community?

A. I’m not sure yet. We are watching to see how Foto is used by everyone from all walks of life and seeing who supports Foto. Building a social media network centered around photography primarily, but images of other types are allowed starts by collecting data, observing, and then making adjustments. I don’t think there is a huge AI community on Foto. There are a few that I know of, but I do not think 50% of the Foto users are AI contributors. From what I can tell, it’s a tiny %.

Q. Is it possible that the AI image makers might eventually outnumber traditional photographers?

A. With how fast Adobe, Google, Apple, and Canvas are incorporating AI, it’s possible, but we don’t really know. No one knows. It’s all speculation. AI images could be just a fad like the NFT craze. To a certain degree, the market will sort itself out, but it will take time. I do think companies will start using AI more, and there isn’t much anyone can do about it. The genie is out of the bottle at this point, and billions are being poured into making AI better every year. It sucks, but that’s what is going on.

Q. Do you plan to allow the photographs posted in the feed to be used to train AI models?

A. No. We are not allowing photos posted to Foto to train AI. If we ever did something like that, it would be something every user would have to opt-in to and we’d need to pay contributors for allowing their photos to be used as training data. Perhaps this is a way photographers can make money and sustain themselves in the future, but again it’s too early to tell.

Can you protect the existing contributing photographers from having their content used in AI mashups?

Q. How might you clearly define original work from Images generated on the databases of other people’s work?

A. This is again something we are discussing, and we’ll talk about it in depth on the Foto podcast episodes about AI. There are some options available now, but we need to build a firm plan around them. We can do something with metadata and third-party software systems that are learning how to identify AI images.

Q. How do you plan to maintain the authenticity and artistic integrity of the community?

A. This ties into the question above. It will be done through metadata, third-party software systems, labeling images, and allowing Foto users to choose what they see. Current social media doesn’t give users control. We want to do the opposite and give users the ability to craft their own experience, but to do that, we need accurate labeling of images and accurate search. This will take years to perfect, if not decades.

Q. If ever you enable photographers to sell their work do you think original photography will be worth as much alongside fantastical AI images?

A. I don’t know. You are asking me to be a futurist and predict the consumer/art buyer market in the future. I can’t predict the future."

Michael also says he's going to record several podcasts with a few different people to discuss AI and the challenges it presents. That will most likely be available on https://fotoapp.substack.com

Expand full comment
gordontant's avatar

Enjoyed reading this one, I understand AI is here to stay in one for or another… I see it as a tool that helps facilitate how you might edit better in regards to photography. My hand is nowhere near steady enough to mask out to the enth degree when separating her from the background, but an AI tool could and it would get better overtime. I do not think AI should be used as a tool for generating images to make a story because it takes work away from the people who have trained long and hard to do this work.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts